the love story

yanik tissera photographs vikram seth
if you are someone that is truly a fan of english literature, if you’ve ever been moved by salman rushdie or set free by george orwell, if you’ve ever been disturbed by anthony burgess or addicted to hunter s. thompson, if you ever laughed with jane austen or loved with william shakespeare, if you ever saw life through the eyes of virginia woolf, then despite all odds, the galle literary festival would have been for you. for all those that didn’t come or came and refused to enjoy it just to make a statement, you either lost a lot, or you aren’t truly a lover of literature. sure, everyone reads; but have you ever really felt? do you remember crying throughout most of ‘the time traveler’s wife’? do you remember losing faith at the end of ‘nineteen eighty four’? do you remember your heart breaking for ‘the hours’? do you remember holding your stomach as you laughed to ‘good omens’?
to smile casually at the writer that once sat down and wrote ‘a suitable boy’, to have heard the man that once found the courage, the audacity to write ‘the city and the pillar’ call george bush ‘dumb-dumb’, to have been told the simplest, greatest secrets of creative writing by the man that made himself a not only a gay icon, but a literary landmark by writing’funny boy’; it was a pleasure that i, for one, would not have missed for the world.
i didn’t get to have lunch with tim severin, nor dinner with william dalrymple, i could not afford this. but it was ok; it would have been ok to have just been there, inside the fort, if just to see them, feel them walk past you, humbly, quietly, shyly.
so, yes, it may have been somewhat exclusive, but anyone that claims that a festival of english literature can be open to everyone is an idealistic, unrealistic fool. english literature is esoteric, it appeals only to a minority rather than the masses. it is for those that can not only read and write english, but for those that can do it well enough to appreciate not just words, but literature written in it. literature isn’t just books, my friend. it isn’t just words. sydney sheldon is not literature. john lennon is. dan brown isn’t, c.s. lewis is. we cannot be so politically correct as to forget that clear distinction.
not to say that the festival itself was perfect. organizationally, it has a long way to go and many lessons to learn. but if i were to downplay the immensity of the experience it offered to me just because of it’s own imperfections, well then i would be silly and ungrateful. i was not there for the fancy jazz shows or the cocktails, the expensive lunches or dinners. no, i was there for them; to see them, to hear them, to get to know them. and i did. and for this, i am elated.
you cannot take that from me. i saw them, spoke to them, learnt from them; and that, for everyone, should have been the most important thing about the galle literary festival 2008.
